giovedì 20 gennaio 2011






Incredible Bongo Band - Bongo rock

http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/51nEjnrsuaL._SL500_AA300_.jpg
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=osgjTEXWDKw

Michael Viner's Incredible Bongo Band: Bongo Rock
Label: Pride | Release Date: 1973 (Audio CD 2006) |
Genre: Classic Rock/Instrumental

01. Apache
02. Let There Be Drum
03. Bongolia
04. Last Bongo In Belgium
05. Dueling Bongos
06. In-A-Gadda-Da-Vida
07. Raunchy '73
08. Bongo Rock
09. Kiburi (Pt. 1)
10. Sing Sing Sing
11. (I Can't Get No) Satisfaction
12. Wipeout
13. When The Bed Breaks Down, I'll Meet You In The Spring
14. Pipeline
15. Okey Dokey
16. Sharp Nine
17. Hang Down Your Head Tom Dooley, Your Tie's Caught In Your Zipper
18. Apache (Grand Master Flash Remix)
19. Last Bongo In Belgium (Breakers Mix)


Cecil Taylor- Garden (1981)
free jazz - solo piano
http://pixhost.info/avaxhome/c7/ea/0014eac7_medium.jpeg
http://rapidshare.com/files/395631978/ctgard.rar.html
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cP5L8tjnB6w
Tracklisting
------CD 1-------
01 (27:00) Elell
02 (24:47) Garden II
------CD 2-------
01 (11:25) Garden 1
02 (08:42) Stepping on Stars
03 (08:29) Introduction to Z
04 (03:30) Driver Says
05 (06:31) Pemmican
06 (02:47) Points
Cecil Taylor - Garden (1981)
Avant-garde jazz | 2CD | MP3 128Kbps | 120 MB
Label: hatHUT


Cecil Taylor - In Florescence (90)
http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/61lJThj-BVL._SL500_AA300_.jpg
1 J.   2:52
2 Pethro Visiting the Abyss   7:08
3 Saita   3:00
4 For Steve McCall   1:00
5 In Florescence   3:02
6 Ell Moving Track   5:15
7 Sirenes 1/3   0:48
8 Anast in Crisis Mouthful of Fresh Cut Flowers   3:37
9 Charles and Thee   8:00
10 Entity   2:32
11 Leaf Taken Horn   4:53
12 Chal Chuiatlichue Goddess of Green Flowing Waters   11:29
13 Morning of Departure   3:13
14 Feng Shui   4:35
http://www.megaupload.com/?d=5WE3U9A3

Cecil Taylor - Unit structures (1966)
http://www.mediafire.com/?mwtzmd4ywjj
http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/51oklITkh8L._SL500_AA300_.jpg
Tracklist:
1. Steps 
2. Enter Evening (Soft Line Structure) 
3. Enter Evening 
4. Unit Structure 
5. As Of Now 
6. Section 
7. Tales (8 Whisps)
First performance from Taylor's "Unit Structures" album. Recorded at the Van Gelder Studio, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey on May 19, 1966. Cecil Taylor (piano, bells); Ken McIntyre (alto saxophone, bass clarinet, oboe); Jimmy Lyons (alto saxophone); Eddie Gale Stevens Jr. (trumpet); Alan Silva, Henry Grimes (bass); Andrew Cyrille (drums).
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D8NEL2tagOs

foto Cecil and his cat on piano in his home in 1960
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/a/a3/CecilTaylor.jpg
CD Description
One of the most important albums of the 1960s free-jazz movement, UNIT STRUCTURES is an exemplary document of advanced musical conception and fiercely intense improvisation. CecilTaylor had been working as a pianist, composer, bandleader,and iconoclast since the mid-'50s, with an increasing allegiance to radical, atonal music; his innovations kept pace with (and, in many cases, preceded) those of contemporaries like Ornette Coleman. The influence of modern classical music (the dramatic, fragmentary scores of Stravinsky, for example) plays heavily in Taylor's vision. The presence of oboe, bass clarinet, and bells on UNIT STRUCTURES (in addition to trumpet, alto sax, and a standard rhythm section) highlights the parallel.
As a pianist, Taylor specialises in violent,rapid-fire chord clusters, churning up clouds of sound withmachine gun-like rapidity. His lengthy compositions have a dynamic ebb and flow, weaving a tapestry of voice-like criesand phrases that build in tension before exploding in a cacophonous frenzy. For all its turbulence, UNIT STRUCTURES is perfectly balanced, revealing interlocking parts that make good on the album's title. A certified free-jazz classic, UNIT STRUCTURES is a must for anyone remotely interested in thestyle.

venerdì 14 gennaio 2011

Gallipoli 2011




passi felpati


Acquedotto Felice - San Policarpo




senza Cuore

GENTE SENZA CUORE

Ovvero, quando il mio piacere è più importante della tua sofferenza

di Franco Libero Manco

Tu che ami la vita, il bene, la libertà, la giustizia, tu che speri in un mondo migliore senza più violenza, senza più dolore, come puoi nutrirti di animali e non inorridire nell’affondare i tuoi denti in quelle carni pregne di dolore? Come puoi considerare legittimo mangiare la gamba, il fegato o il cervello di una creatura simile a te che non chiede nulla se non di avere il suo umile pasto e la sua libertà? Come puoi accettare di buon grado l’idea che una creatura mite e possente come un cavallo, un bue, un vitello venga crudelmente allevato al solo scopo di essere ucciso, per te? Non pensi quale meraviglia sia il corpo di un essere vivente, a quale stupefacente meccanismo racchiude? Pensa alla capacità del suo cervello di elaborare pensieri, ai suoi occhi di percepire le cose, ai suoi orecchi di udire i suoni, al suo cuore di pulsare, ai suoi polmoni di assorbire l’aria, ai suoi reni di filtrare il sangue. Pensa a questo capolavoro dell’universo che sarà annientato per sempre, a causa tua.

Considera la tua vita e paragonala a quella degli animali allevati. La tua lunga vita è piena di tante cose, ma nella sua brevissima esistenza un animale d’allevamento non conosce che privazione e sofferenza. Mentre tu sei in una casa confortevole, pulita e riscaldata, al coperto dal freddo, dal gelo, dal vento, dalla pioggia; mentre tu dormi in un letto morbido e caldo; mentre ti svaghi, ti diverti, giochi, leggi, l’animale è li, al buio, incatenato senza potersi muovere e senza il conforto di potersi avvicinare al suo simile. L’animale non fa nulla, perché non può fare nulla, solo aspetta, nel buio della notte, mite, paziente, tra i suoi stessi escrementi, e non ha nulla se non la sua stessa vita. In una solitudine abissale, soffre in silenzio, in un dolore che non sa spiegarsi e contro il quale è senza scampo. E senza la possibilità di essere salvato si avvia impotente verso la morte.

Eppure sai quale angoscia genera la perdita di una persona cara, la disperazione che nasce dall’impotenza contro un male che non possiamo combattere. Tu forse sai cosa sia un terribile mal di denti o una lancinante colica renale. Immagina te stesso in questa circostanza, solo e senza la possibilità di ricorrere agli antidolorifici del medico. Immagina di doverti estrarre un molare senza l’ausilio degli anestetici allora capirai la condizione degli animali.

Come puoi essere indifferente al dolore dell’altro tu che per ogni piccola ferita ricorri alle cure del medico? Tu che ti rivolgi alle autorità per ogni piccola ingiustizia che subisci, come puoi considerare giusto e lecito infliggere l’ingiustizia suprema della privazione della libertà, della tortura e della morte ad una creatura innocente per soddisfare i tuoi piaceri? Accetteresti ugualmente di buon grado l’ipotesi che noi e i nostri figli fossimo allevati da extraterrestri, contro cui risulterebbe impossibile ogni reazione, per diventare loro pasto?

Tu che non hai pietà delle tue vittime ma speri che Dio ascolti le tue preghiere e possa preservarti dalla sofferenza e dalla morte, in che modo rispondi alle grida degli animali nelle mani dei carnefici ai quali tu li consegni?

Ma gli animali non soffrono solo negli allevamenti intensivi e nei mattatoi, veri e propri campi di concentramento e di sterminio. Hai mai pensato a quale spaventoso inferno sono condannati centinaia di milioni di animali all’anno nei laboratori di sperimentazione? Pensa a quei gattini a cui sono stati cucite le palpebre alla nascita per sperimentare capacità alternative alla vista. Pensa a quell’uccello con il fianco spappolato da una fucilata: è come se l’esplosione di bomba avesse spezzato a te le gambe e non avessi nessuno a cui chiedere aiuto. Pensa all’agonia dei pesci nelle reti. Pensa agli animali da pelliccia allevati e spellati spesso ancora vivi. Pensa agli animali nei circhi equestri costretti, con la frusta, la fame e le scariche elettriche, a ripetere per anni innaturali esercizi. Pensa a tutto questo e se non ti dissoci da queste barbarie dovresti vergognarti di essere un uomo.

Ma non hai un cuore? Non hai una coscienza? In che ti differenzi dalla pietra inanimata tu che non consideri il dolore e la vita dell’altro ma che hai la presunzione di essere fatto ad immagine di Dio? Gli animali a cui spegni per sempre la vita, tu che mangi la carne durante la tua esistenza, riempirebbero un campo da tennis. E non ti vergogni di un simile misfatto, di tale crimine contro la vita e contro la fratellanza universale?

Nella speranza di un cuore umano più giusto e sensibile sta il segreto del bene e della pace nel mondo. Come potrebbe l’uomo nuocere al suo simile se avesse la sensibilità di condividere il dolore degli altri ? Se fosse educato alla dolcezza verso ogni essere vivente?

Be happy

We should measure Gross National Happiness, not Gross National Product (GDP), said Bhutan in 1972. Ever since, it has been a poster child for happiness. Its pursuit of happiness has influenced many people including Nobel Laureates Joseph Stiglitz and Amartya Sen, who helped produce a recent UN report on ''The Measurement of Economic Performance and Social Progress."

GDP is a vulgar measure that misses many issues that make people happy, says the report. So, countries should also measure quality-of-life indicators such as leisure, education, social relationships, political voice and governance. Bhutan's own happiness index includes the frequency of meditation and prayer.

Now, everybody will agree that happiness is much more than GDP. However, Bhutan's dirty secret is that it is world champion in GDP growth.

The global recession sent growth plunging in many countries in 2008, but Bhutan had the fastest GDP growth rate in the world at 21.4%, says the CIA World Factbook. Back in the 1980s, Bhutan was much poorer than India. Today, thanks to galloping economic growth for two decades, Bhutan is almost twice as rich as India: its per capita income was $1,900 in 2008 against India's $1,070.

Was record GDP growth spurred by the pursuit of happiness? Actually, it was spurred by giant hydropower projects that India has been building in Bhutan for two decades. Bhutan's current hydropower capacity is 1,480 MW, and it plans additional projects to generate 10,000 MW of power by 2020, almost entirely for export to India, which provides all the financing.

Large dams are not usually regarded as recipes for happiness. Environmentalists usually condemn them for displacing people and submerging forests. Bhutan's neat ploy has been to adopt a green name (Druk Green Power Corporation) for its hydropower producer. It gets away with this since environmentalists don't want to attack a much ballyhooed Shangri-La of happiness.

Its first big hydropower project of 336 MW capacity at Chuka was commissioned in 1988. This was followed by Kurichhu (60MW) in 2001, Basochho (40MW) in 2005 and the giant Tala project (1,020 MW) in 2007. The commissioning of Tala largely explains the subsequent huge jump in GDP in 2008. Electricity revenue will provide no less than 60% of the government's entire revenue in 2009. Yet, barely 66% of Bhutanese households and 39% of its villages are electrified.

Developing countries with rich natural resources, like oil, often fare very badly (as in Africa). Economists talk of a "resource curse" that enables a kleptocratic ruling elite to become very rich, without any productive effort or decent governance. Revenues from natural resources flow directly to governments, bypassing citizens.

HAPPINESS

THIMPHU, Bhutan — Five years ago, Tashi Wangyal had it all: a Masters degree in philosophy from Cambridge University, a beautiful girlfriend, and an attractive job offer as a consultant in London. But the scholarship student, then 25 years of age, threw it all away for a $120-a-month job in Bhutan, the isolated Buddhist kingdom perched in the Himalayas.
The Bhutanese native's decision confounded his university friends, particularly classmates from neighboring India and Nepal who dreamed of working abroad in high-paying jobs. But Mr. Wangyal thought long and hard about a different commodity that preoccupies the minds of his fellow Bhutanese: happiness.
"The reason was fairly simple: the more I traveled and lived abroad, the more I learned to appreciate what we had at home," he says.
Despite Bhutan being among the poorest nations in the world, almost all of its scholarship students studying overseas return home after graduation. One reason they cite: The Bhutanese government has not only pushed forward with improvements in health care, education and the environment, it has also actively pursued the more elusive goal of promoting its nation's happiness.
A few years ago, the government threw out the usual indicators measuring progress, replacing them instead with an innovative model — called "gross national happiness" — that now has researchers and think-tank agencies around the world taking note. While GNH isn't something that can be charted or ranked, Bhutan's concept embraces everything from protecting natural resources to promoting a strong national culture and ensuring democratic governance — goals that help create a foundation of happiness for citizens.
"Bhutan is a very rare example, probably the only example in the world, of a country that has built happiness into the center of its development strategy," says Ron Coleman, director of GPI Atlantic, a Canadian nonprofit research organization that studies the quality of life. "They are sacrificing short-term income for long-term social health."
It's not only Bhutan that is questioning the value of measuring material wealth without regard to a more comprehensive notion of fulfillment.
The World Values Survey, a group of international social scientists, released a report last year that ranked happiness by country. The study, which analyzes the impact of values and beliefs on political and social life through a series of questionnaires, concluded that the African country of Nigeria is the happiest in the world, perhaps a result of its residents' striking tendency to describe their emotional highs in extreme terms; the U.S. came in at 16.
At least one marketing firm in the U.S. is interested in tweaking the old GDP model to take into account well-being. And Ed Diener, a professor of psychology at the University of Illinois, has been asked by the Gallup Organization, the U.S.-based research and polling group, to create a national well-being index. Although the initiative has just begun, "the goal is to design something that could sit next to the Dow Jones average [stock index] in the corner of the TV screen," he says.
Mr. Diener has spent the past 18 years studying the link between happiness and prosperity. He's trying to debunk the notion that gross domestic product, a measure of a country's economic production, provides an accurate snapshot of national well-being.
Mr. Diener recently analyzed more than 150 studies on wealth and happiness, copublishing a comprehensive report, "Beyond Money: Toward an Economy of Well-Being." His conclusion on global progress: "Although economic output has risen steeply over the past decades, there has been no rise in life satisfaction."
According to Mr. Diener's report, as societies attain a certain level of wealth, income becomes less of a factor in people's level of contentment. Emotional well-being is determined not necessarily by your bank account, but by the quality of social relationships, enjoyment at work, job stability, democratic institutions and strong human rights.
Emotional well-being is something Bhutan's King Druk Gyalpo Jigme Singye Wangchuck has been pursuing for his subjects since he ascended the throne in 1972. Like Mr. Diener, the king sought an alternative to the GDP progress ranking. His philosophy was this: GDP reveals precious little about a nation's true wealth. Leaders shouldn't only strive for material wealth, they must also cultivate inner contentment.
Master Plan
The concept was formalized in 1998, with the prime minister of the time, Lyonpo Jigmi Thinley, charged with articulating the government's new master plan, dubbed the Four Pillars of Happiness. These pillars — sustainable economic development, conservation of the environment, the promotion of national culture, and good governance — create conditions "in which every individual will be able to pursue happiness with reasonable success," says Mr. Thinley.
First and foremost, in the wake of globalization, the tiny kingdom of Bhutan — population 828,000 — had to push reforms that would stimulate its economic development. But the key, as outlined in the first pillar, was "sustainable" economic development. This meant prioritizing long-term healthcare, education and social economic services over other infrastructure needs. To this end, about a quarter of the country's annual budget was set aside for hospital services and schools.
The second pillar, conservation of the environment, was also given top priority in the country's new development scheme. Rather than throw open the country's doors to foreign investment and sell off its precious natural resources, the country kept investors at bay, banned the export of unprocessed timber, and restricted the number of tourists to about 6,000 per year.
The third pillar, the promotion of culture, was considered essential to maintain spiritual balance. Anchoring his subjects in religious practice was part of the king's master plan. And finally, the last goal was good governance. In 1998, the king accelerated the process of democratization by voluntarily divesting himself of some of his powers. The government's Council of Ministers is now elected and vested with full executive powers.
Not only was Mr. Thinley charged with helping to draft these policies to ensure happiness, but the king assigned him "the task of taking the concept of GNH beyond our borders." The graying statesmen didn't relish the job: "I went, but with a great sense of hesitation because we had no idea how it would be received," he recalls.
But the world has been hungry for a little happiness. In the past few years Mr. Thinley has been talking about GNH on the international speakers circuit, including at a United Nations' conference in Seoul in 1998.
Bhutan may also generate its own quantifiable happiness index for use abroad. Mr. Coleman, of GPI Atlantic, is hoping to work with the Center for Bhutan Studies to calculate a well-being ranking that will factor in human values.
Social Improvements
Mr. Thinley is eager to prove that his country didn't sacrifice development for happiness, and social indices back this up. Since 1985, life expectancy has improved from 48 years to 66 years. Over that time, infant mortality has dropped from 142 deaths per thousand to 61. Education is also a success story: The literacy rate has climbed from 23% to 54% of the population, and the country's first university was inaugurated in 2003. In addition, the number of health facilities rose from 65 in 1985 to 155 today.
The country's economic prospects are also improving. Bhutan's GDP has risen about 45% in the past few years, moving from $445 million in 1999 to $645 million in 2003. While its neighbor Nepal has a much higher GDP, it ranks lower than Bhutan on education and environmental fronts. In Bhutan, more than 90% of children reach grade five schooling, compared to 62% in Nepal.
Bhutan is no utopia. Its capital is looking less pristine these days, beset by traffic jams at rush hour and the strains of rapid growth from urbanization. Set in picturesque mountains, it's experiencing a mini-boom in building that is cluttering a once unspoiled landscape.
Five years ago, Bhutan hired its first psychologist, Chencho Dorji. "Among the youth, we are seeing more anxiety," Mr. Dorji says. He attributes this in part to job insecurity: "We have acquired a huge population boom since the 1960s because of increased health care.…Parents are anxious about the future of their kids."
The belated arrival of media and technology has also had an impact. Television was finally allowed into the country in 1998, and cell phones were introduced last year. "Suddenly it's dawned on us that ours is a growing materialistic society," says Mr. Dorji. Stress and alcoholism are also on the rise.
But ask any local if Bhutanese citizens are the happiest in the world, and the answer is most likely yes.
The secret to Bhutan's success is balance, says restaurant owner Sangay Penjor, 53, who runs the Yoddzer Hotel and Indian restaurant in Bhutan's capital of Thimphu. During peak tourist season he can make $2,000 a month profit; in the lean months, he just breaks even. "If you are too poor, you are fighting for your basic needs," he says. "But when there's an excess of ambition and goals you lose track of your human face. Once your basic needs are taken care of, you should know what is enough."
Religion provides the check, he adds. "It's human nature to want money and every comfort that the modern world offers you: electricity, cars, expensive things." Despite the arrival of secular influences such as television and mobile phones, spiritual life in Bhutan is stronger than ever, with enrollments at monasteries reaching an all-time high, and donations at record levels.
So, if religion is one of the keys to happiness, can Buddhist Bhutan serve as a template for other countries? "Other countries can learn from [Bhutan's] ability to take national planning to the grassroots level," says Enrique Pantoja, a World Bank country officer.
But there is a catch. "The evolution of Bhutan as a nation has been underlined by the articulation of a distinct Bhutanese identity. I think it would be difficult for any country without such a strong philosophy and development vision to emulate Bhutan's," he says.
Community Values
The indicators for happiness as defined by both Mr. Coleman and Mr. Diener of the University of Illinois mirror the reasons Tashi Wangyal gives for returning to the country. While it was important for Mr. Wangyal to provide comfortably for his family — he earns about the average wage for a government employee — it wasn't high on his list of aspirations. Having a voice and making a contribution to society gave him more pleasure. Mr. Wangyal, now a researcher at the Foreign Affairs Ministry, says good governance and political reforms made him confident about the future of his country, as did the free medical care and education.
But, most importantly: "Bhutan is one of the best places in the world to raise a child." Mr. Wangyal, who married his childhood sweetheart, Dechen Wangmo, and now has a two-and-a-half-year-old daughter, says that he has a whole network of people to look after his family if he has to work late. "People in the West focus on career. It's fairly individualistic," he says. In Bhutan, "community values are prized and everyone helps each other out."
There are some downsides, he admits. It's too expensive to travel outside of Bhutan, and he still can't afford a car. Mr. Wangyal's biggest purchase since his return was a $300 mountain bike that he rides to work every day. And then there's his weakness for fresh coffee. "There's no Starbucks here. That's what I miss the most."

mercoledì 5 gennaio 2011

Perchè mi succede questo ?

Perchè mi succede questo?
C'era una volta un re che aveva un consigliere al quale si rivolgeva tutte le volte che doveva prendere importanti decisioni o per farsi aiutare per interpretare gli eventi e i segni del destino.
Un giorno, durante una festa a corte in cui tutti si cimentarono in giochi e sfide con armature lance e scudi, il re si ferisce ad una mano e perde un dito.
Avvilito si ritira nel suo palazzo e manda a chiamare il suo consigliere al quale chiede con le lacrime agli occhi la ragione di quella sua disgrazia, se mai ve n'era una.
Il consigliere risponde di non conoscere il vero motivo di quanto accaduto, ma che sua maestà non doveva dubitare sul fatto che tale disgrazia aveva sicuramente una sua oscura ragione che non era dato conoscere al momento.
Il re infuriato perchè insoddisfatto del responso del suo consigliere, per tutta risposta lo fa chiudere nelle segrete del castello.
Alcuni anni dopo, durante una battuta di caccia, il re si perde nei boschi e sceso da cavallo, smarrisce anche quest'ultimo che si allontana improvvisamente e inspiegabilmente al galoppo.
Egli cerca di trovare il gruppo di cacciatori coi quali era uscito per la battuta di caccia, tende l'orecchio per vedere se riesce a sentire in lontanaza i cani, ma nulla di tutto questo.
A un certo punto, stanco di camminare e affranto per le molte ore trascorse inutilmente alla ricerca della strada per il castello, e con un senso di angoscia per la notte che si appressava, decide di mettersi a sedere ai piedi di un albero e si addormenta appoggiando la schiena al tronco.
Ma improvvisamente viene risvegliato dal suono di voci e urla disumane; una tribù di uomini vestiti in modo alquanto bizzarro lo ha scoperto nel bosco e lo fa prigioniero per portarlo al cospetto del loro capo. Il quale gli fa tutta una serie di domande, ma non credendo ad una sola parola di quanto il re gli dice e scambiatolo per uno dei tanti avventurieri e vagabondi decide di immolarlo in onore della loro divinità. Ma prima si reca dal suo sacerdote per avere la certezza che avrebbe fatto cosa gradita al loro dio e per assicurarsi di non attirarsi le sue ire.
Il sacerdote si fa allora portare il prigioniero e lo esamina attentamente, ma quando si accorge che ad una mano manca un dito sentenzia che non era adatto per donarlo in sacrificio al loro dio. Cosicchè il re viene liberato e accompagnato con grande scherno nelle vicinanze del castello che quelli si rifiutavano di credere fosse veramente il suo regno.
Quando la popolazione e tutti i suoi fedeli servitori e tutti quanti i cavalieri si accorsero che il re era tornato sano e salvo, si apprestarono a fare grandi festeggiamenti e a sostituire tutti i segni di lutto che esprimevano il dolore per la recente perdita del loro sovrano con gli addobbi festivi più sgargianti e colorati che avevano a disposizione.
Ma mentre tutti festeggiavano e ballavano e si divertivano, il re ripensò al suo vecchio consigliere ancora segregato nelle prigioni del castello. Così decise di farsi accompagnare là da lui per potergli parlare.
Quasi non lo riconobbe per quanto fosse provato per tutti quegli anni di buio, di fame e di maltrattamenti. Per prima cosa gli chiese umilmente scusa perchè aveva finalmente capito che era stata proprio la perdita del dito ad averlo salvato da quella tribù di selvaggi. Ma poi, in tono sarcastico e come per togliersi ogni senso di colpa, chiese però al consigliere quale invece era stato il motivo valido e ragionevole per la sua vita di avere trascorso tutti quegli anni rinchiuso in una cella.
"Sire" rispose il vecchio e provato consigliere, "se Vostra Maestà non mi avesse rinchiuso qui sotto, io come Voi mi sarei perso nei boschi durante la battuta di caccia e sarei stato catturato insieme a Vostra Altezza dalla tribù dei ribelli, i quali mi avrebbero sicuramente immolato al loro dio, perchè a differenza Vostra io possiedo tutte e dieci le dita delle mani!"

capodanno greco-romano con invasione tedesca

 roberta sorella di leonardo,pablosmoker,agnes,SPIROS,GEORGIA,SOPHIA,MANOS,zonetti
 teo,martino,SPIROS,GEORGIA,SOPHIA,MANOS,zonetti,FABRIOLO
 ALEXANDROS,DAPHNE,FABRIOLO
DAPHNE E FABRIOLO